YouTube
Evidence depth, not invented power
Uma Fighters Tier List: Evidence-Based Character Review
Compare the characters named in accepted showcases while seeing exactly what the evidence still cannot support. The current page ranks documentation depth rather than power because a complete roster, stable version label, comparable frame data, damage tables, and matchup results were not available. You can inspect observed moves and kit capabilities for Haru Urara, Director Akikawa, and Rice Shower without mistaking broader showcase coverage for proven current competitive strength today.
Transparent methodEvidence depth replaces fake certainty
Named kitsShowcase tools stay tied to characters
Missing dataVersion and roster gaps stay visible
Repeatable reviewFuture data can update the method
Watch a release gameplay reference
Use this community release footage for visual context, not as a complete current roster or version-locked balance dataset.
Why this is an evidence review
Accepted evidence names Haru Urara, Director Akikawa, and Rice Shower, but it does not confirm that those three form the complete current roster. It also lacks comparable frame data, damage tables, matchup results, and a verified current version. A conventional S-to-D list would therefore imply more knowledge than the sources provide.
Haru Urara and Director Akikawa receive broad-showcase labels because multiple named moves, variants, and mechanics were demonstrated. Rice Shower receives a limited-showcase label because the accepted source explicitly restricted which moves could be shown. The labels describe documentation depth and do not claim that one character defeats another.
A future power ranking requires a dated full roster, complete kits, consistent test conditions, current patch context, and repeatable matches across comparable skill levels. Until that evidence exists, the live character-selection screen is the final roster reference.
Documentation depth can still guide further research. Broad coverage identifies which interactions are ready for controlled testing, while limited coverage shows where a source gap must be filled first. It cannot determine who wins neutral, which matchup is favored, how easy a kit is to use, or whether an older showcased interaction survived the latest balance update in the live game.
Choose how to use the review
Start with the evidence page, then move to gameplay or first-session learning when you need system context.
I want the character comparison
See observed moves, capabilities, missing data, and why no S-tier claim is justified.
Read evidence reviewI need system context
Understand normal attacks, block, dash, variants, specials, and awakening before comparing kits.
Open gameplay guideI am choosing a first character
Use the live move panel and a simple practice order rather than a manufactured rank.
Read beginner guideI want transferable habits
Practice blocking, spacing, and evasive decisions that do not depend on an unsupported rank.
Read beginner tipsFeatured character evidence article
The published article card is derived from validated metadata and carries its actual review date.
All character reviews
Browse every published comparison owned by this category. Empty power ranks are not manufactured to fill the directory.
Compare with the underlying systems
Gameplay systemsReview the combat and movement vocabulary used in kit notes.Beginner guidePractice one character without depending on a rank.Beginner tipsBuild habits that transfer across characters.UpdatesCheck release and article review context.Submit evidenceSend a dated source and the exact claim it supports.
Tier list questions
Who is S tier?
No defensible current S-tier claim can be made from the accepted evidence because comparable current balance and matchup data are missing.
Which characters are confirmed in the evidence?
The accepted showcase material names Haru Urara, Director Akikawa, and Rice Shower, but does not establish the complete current roster.
Why are Haru Urara and Director Akikawa grouped together?
Both have broad observed kit coverage. The grouping reflects documentation depth, not equal strength or matchup results.
Why is Rice Shower listed as limited?
The accepted source explicitly limited which Rice Shower moves could be shown, preventing a comparable complete-kit review.
What would change this page into a power ranking?
A current full roster, complete kits, version context, comparable tests, and repeatable matchup evidence would be required.
Read the evidence before using a rank
See which tools were actually observed, what the sources omit, and why documentation depth is more honest than an unsupported power order.